PS Power Books • Forum

Keeley Thomson • read new Keely books, edits

2022-09-15T09:28:07-05:00

Hi, finished the new books and loved them again, not much for re reading works in general, but it was nice to touch base with Keely again. It has been to long since I read the first versions, so no comment on if better or improved from the first, keep up the great work.

List of mistakes that I picked up,

Book 1 Even ? looks like it was meant to be Eve on page 53
DArla ? small a page 93
Mee ? maybe meet page 129
gan ? maybe gang page 135
and what looks like a break in structure on page 167

Book 2 I,t ? It page 15
ws ? was page 31

Book 3 keely ? Keely about 23 percent in place 614/2780 for some reason some books don't have page numbers for me.

anyway these jumped out at me on reading, not sure if it is me getting tired or dropping into the zone or you got cleaner or in your own zone, either way I look forward to the next books coming next month. Cheers.

kind regards Kurt.

Statistics: Posted by Kurt — Thu Sep 15, 2022 9:28 am

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2017-01-09T09:44:18-05:00

Who knows? Might be a comment on being pushed into that situation instead of the protagonist creating the situation were death-by-hands was necessary; eg. actio vs reactio.

But I agree, novels "by committee" usually don't work out too well. That being said, I read a lot lately were I desperately wished the author had gotten some more feedback ^^

Statistics: Posted by Pyottl — Mon Jan 09, 2017 9:44 am

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2016-12-10T01:07:29-05:00

Um... I think you should trust your instincts on that one! I mean, if beating people to death with ones bare hands is too passive, then I must be a real wimp, you know? I hardly even threaten people...

With words!

What you have sounds fine to me, to be honest.

Statistics: Posted by PS Power — Sat Dec 10, 2016 1:07 am

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2016-12-10T00:47:35-05:00

thanks for the advice.

I'm thinking I will avoid posting on royalroadl for my next book. The comments have frazzled my perception of my work too much.

At one point, after my character *literally beat a man to death with his bare hands*, people had commented that my character was 'too passive'. I spent probably 3 minutes staring at that comment flabbergasted. The following comment agreed and said the character should have slaughtered a servant in response to a slight from his host. Yup, not an audience in line with my vision of book is my thinking =-P

Statistics: Posted by addmoreice — Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:47 am

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2016-12-09T15:34:38-05:00

That should be fine, as long as the reader can understand what is going on. Most people don't actually have to be led to every single thing constantly.

"The duel was put forth by the other man." is enough to be understood really.

Yes, there is the idea of "show, don't tell" but recall, when that rule came into play in publishing, books regularly had pages and pages of outline like exposition instead of things being shown! It was about stopping that, not shorthanding things occasionally to keep the story moving at the pace you choose.

There IS no right way to tell your story though. Do what works for you. It will be enough.

Statistics: Posted by PS Power — Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:34 pm

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2016-12-07T16:49:42-05:00

Any suggestions on how to handle such 'off screen' scenes like that?

In my book there is a duel, to preserve a consequence of the duel (besides the fight) which is a plot twist, the actual challenge too the duel is off scene. The reason to force a duel is talked about, and dealing with the duel, and the consequence but not the declaring a duel itself.

Statistics: Posted by addmoreice — Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:49 pm

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2016-12-02T19:00:56-05:00

Yes. The fact that he was her slave was the confirmation that she'd done it off page.

Statistics: Posted by PS Power — Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:00 pm

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2016-12-02T07:55:47-05:00

During the explanation of how she will leave most free, she thinks about having to take Steve again so he doesn't slack off. Just never shows the actual grab.

Statistics: Posted by DAAgnew — Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:55 am

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2016-12-02T04:40:19-05:00

I assumed she did re-enslave him.

Statistics: Posted by Korwin — Fri Dec 02, 2016 4:40 am

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2016-12-02T02:17:52-05:00

But in book 2 and 3 of the Tyler G trilogy it explicitly states that Steve York is her slave, I was just wondering when that happened, because he would've been freed when Zack killed her.

Statistics: Posted by Eyakos — Fri Dec 02, 2016 2:17 am

Keeley Thomson • Re: Steve York?

2016-12-01T23:12:31-05:00

She didn't. That's not what the they were saying.

Statistics: Posted by David — Thu Dec 01, 2016 11:12 pm

Keeley Thomson • Steve York?

2016-12-01T22:29:23-05:00

I read all the Demonverse series way out of order in that I read the Other Places trilogy first, then the first two Keeleys, then the Tyler G trilogy, finished Keeley, then read Eve and Avery. So I noticed something and got confused, when did Keeley re-enslave Steve? When Zack kills her all of her links were broken and she lets them all stay away to protect them, but one of the plot points in the Tyler G series is the fact that he figures out how to destroy a link without killing anyone and uses the ability to free Steve from her. So did I just miss where this was addressed or do I just take it as she felt it was best to make him a slave again some time after book 5?

Statistics: Posted by Eyakos — Thu Dec 01, 2016 10:29 pm

Keeley Thomson • Re: Sparks Nevada is REAL!

2015-07-20T08:46:00-05:00

There are instructions to be found online for how to make a fusion reactor, but you have to go through various organizations to get approval for safety reasons. It's really nothing more than a science experiment and teaching tool as the reactor that's creates consumes more energy than it outputs.

Statistics: Posted by RyanM — Mon Jul 20, 2015 8:46 am

Keeley Thomson • Re: Sparks Nevada is REAL!

2015-07-20T03:58:38-05:00

It isn't that hard to make fusion reactors. Even really good ones. The hard part is getting around the Men in Black.

I've said too much!

Never mind. Nothing to see here!

Statistics: Posted by PS Power — Mon Jul 20, 2015 3:58 am

Keeley Thomson • Re: Sparks Nevada is REAL!

2015-07-17T08:12:51-05:00

Really? No one cares about the super genius boy in that school near Sparks who built a working fusion device?

Statistics: Posted by Mark — Fri Jul 17, 2015 8:12 am