For starters:
Dale, don't stop writing and don't throw away what you've written. You have a loyal fan base that obviously loves your ability to tell a story and engage the reader in your worlds.
YA: I love the mix of stone age, iron age, space age, and modern age technologies interwoven with magic. It's a vibrant world with tons of spin-off potential.
Gwen: I like how the alternate histories shaped the world and how the presence of magic retarded technological and social development.
Keelyverse: The demons are interesting and varied; they aren't caricatures of evil. Each demon has a purpose beyond just being a bad guy. I *LOVE* your version of vampires. Using blood to build energy links to animate their bodies is a far more interesting idea than simply drinking blood because it's creepy. Even in the Alternate Places world, I like how it's used to appease a tiny spirit.
Infected: One of my pet peeves is in super hero genre is how there are few detractors about having a power. The First Mode idea neatly gets around that problem. Someone can be super powered, but that power comes at a high cost. Case-in-point: Lauren/Level
Most of the criticisms some of us have identified are technical in nature and are easily handled in the editing process if you so desire (I'll gladly volunteer to suggest edits the next time you're ready for editing). In the end, they are YOUR books. Do what you feel is right. I can't see you losing any of us as readers.
Now onto the Amazon-centric stuff:
Why would someone pay another to write bad reviews?
What's to gain by hurting another author?
Wouldn't you WANT another author to do well especially if it's in the same genre so it could offer up automated suggestions that send people to you?
Something to keep in mind is that some people are just assholes. They're looking for reasons to give a bad review. Also, ratings me different things to different people. For example, I almost never rate something as a 5 because, to me, a 5 means I can read a story multiple times, not get tired of it, and find something new every time I read it. Few books can meet that standard, nor do I expect them to.
I think the Kindle Unlimited program might be interfering with numbers a bit. I read a ton of books through that program, but it doesn't always track that I've read the book since it's not an active purchase.
Dale, don't stop writing and don't throw away what you've written. You have a loyal fan base that obviously loves your ability to tell a story and engage the reader in your worlds.
YA: I love the mix of stone age, iron age, space age, and modern age technologies interwoven with magic. It's a vibrant world with tons of spin-off potential.
Gwen: I like how the alternate histories shaped the world and how the presence of magic retarded technological and social development.
Keelyverse: The demons are interesting and varied; they aren't caricatures of evil. Each demon has a purpose beyond just being a bad guy. I *LOVE* your version of vampires. Using blood to build energy links to animate their bodies is a far more interesting idea than simply drinking blood because it's creepy. Even in the Alternate Places world, I like how it's used to appease a tiny spirit.
Infected: One of my pet peeves is in super hero genre is how there are few detractors about having a power. The First Mode idea neatly gets around that problem. Someone can be super powered, but that power comes at a high cost. Case-in-point: Lauren/Level
Most of the criticisms some of us have identified are technical in nature and are easily handled in the editing process if you so desire (I'll gladly volunteer to suggest edits the next time you're ready for editing). In the end, they are YOUR books. Do what you feel is right. I can't see you losing any of us as readers.
Now onto the Amazon-centric stuff:
Why would someone pay another to write bad reviews?
What's to gain by hurting another author?
Wouldn't you WANT another author to do well especially if it's in the same genre so it could offer up automated suggestions that send people to you?
Something to keep in mind is that some people are just assholes. They're looking for reasons to give a bad review. Also, ratings me different things to different people. For example, I almost never rate something as a 5 because, to me, a 5 means I can read a story multiple times, not get tired of it, and find something new every time I read it. Few books can meet that standard, nor do I expect them to.
I think the Kindle Unlimited program might be interfering with numbers a bit. I read a ton of books through that program, but it doesn't always track that I've read the book since it's not an active purchase.